A Mystery in an Old Wine Bottle

Hitler WineAlexander Autographs A bottle of wine from Adolf Hitler’s personal wine cellar at his mountain retreat, the Berghof.

It was supposed to be a straightforward news story: an auction house was finding that items believed to have belonged to Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun were in high demand, even in a recession. But a coincidence along the way led to a mystery.

It all began when the auctioneer, Alexander Autographs, in Stamford, Conn., announced the sale of possessions from the respected collector John K. Lattimer. Building on connections made during his time working at the Nuremburg war tribunals, Dr. Lattimer had collected a vast trove of memorabilia before his death in 2007, including a matchbox with Hitler’s initials, a powder compact with Eva Braun’s initials and a 1934 bottle of Bordeaux believed to from Hitler’s wine cellar at his mountain residence, the Berghof.

In a catalog of auctioned items, the bottle’s label stated that the wine was from St.-Émilion in France, and it featured the village’s church. But there was a problem: On the label, St.-Émilion was presented as a flat village with a Stalinist-style structure towering over the church. Having been married there just last October, I did not recall any structure that looked like that. That night, my husband and I pored through our wedding photos, but we found nothing of that scale near the church.

Alexander Autographs said it had proof that the bottle was authentic: Mohawk Arms, an established auctioneer in Bouckville, N.Y, had vetted the bottle when it was sold to Dr. Lattimer in 1975, and it had the 1975 letter and invoice. Alexander Autographs also had the catalog from the 1975 auction, stating: “In 1945, a team of U.S. Army demolition experts were dispatched to the Berghof to completely destroy the Hitler summer residence. One of the G.I.’s placed one of the bottles from the cellar in his jacket before the entire building was completely destroyed.”

Evan Lattimer, Dr. Lattimer’s daughter, said that the bottle — half empty from years of poor storage — looked authentic to her and even came in a box that appeared official, with German lettering.

But why didn’t the bottle list a specific chateau? Why did it have a German label with a strange interpretation of the village where I got married? Was this just a bottle of table wine?

On May 14, the bottle sold for $900. While the buyer would not give his name, Matt Brennan, research and cataloging specialist of Alexander Autographs, described him as the owner of a high-end Manhattan wine store and a collector.

He said the new owner did not plan to drink the wine or even display it. He wanted to keep it in his office and show it to some friends. He told Mr. Brennan that the bottle reminded him of the phrase “in vino veritas” — in wine there is truth — and that he was “fascinated by the idea that Hitler, in the midst of planning such awful atrocities, would stop to enjoy a glass of wine.”

But that answer raised more questions than it revealed truths. Another purchaser of Hitler-related memorabilia at the auction e-mailed to say he had not bid on the wine bottle because Hitler was not known for drinking.

Donald and Petie Kladstrup, co-authors of “Wine and War: The French, the Nazis, and the Battle for France’s Greatest Treasure,” had some answers. The couple had interviewed soldiers and families who were in the wine trade during the war and had seen many of the bottles owned by Hitler and other high-ranking officials. They said Hitler occasionally drank wine, though he preferred beer.

But they, too, had concerns about the bottle. They had interviewed Bernard de Nonancourt, a French soldier who first opened the wine cellars at the Berghof and discovered that Hitler had a formidable wine collection.

Many of Hitler’s high-ranking officials had connections to the wine industry and made sure that their cellars were filled. That means it is questionable that Hitler would have a bottle of wine without the name of a specific chateau. They also pointed out that there was no need for soldiers to “smuggle” any items out of the Berghof because at the time many soldiers were openly walking out with memorabilia.

“The whole question of provenance is really, really up in the air,” Mr. Kladstrup said. “It sets off alarm bells left and right.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Perley J. Thibodeau May 27, 2009 · 11:50 am

That’s the big difference between this writer and me
I wouldn’t have checked the label, I would have checked my marriage licence.

The fiorst really strange thing is that it says “Frankreich” in German… Obviously, if this were real it would have to mean that a german propaganda machine took off original labels and replaced them with German labels that were appealing to Hitler. I can’t imagine a French chateau in 1934 making a wine for Hitler with a special label. He became Fuhrer in 1934 and was rapibly expanding the size of his army way beyong teh Versaiiles Treaty accrod. The first war was too much on the mind of my French people to make such an absurd label. Maybe during Vichy gov’t, but that’s not until 1940. The picture with socialist biuolding must’ve been added for more empahsis by German designers. Or, it’s just a really strange and poor fake.

It also seems unlikely that wine bottled in France would have been labeled with the German spelling of France, unless it was specifically being prepared for shipment to Germany. Even then, I would imagine keeping the label in French would give the wine more cachet.

Ha, If I believe everything I read on a wine label I’d never be sober. they are like book covers…

Warren Howie Hughes May 27, 2009 · 12:33 pm

Is this 1934 bottle of Bordeaux, allegedly from the cellars of Hitler’s mountain residence, the Berghof, actually the genuine article or a tawdry knock-off! Verily, I venture to say, “We think Vino the answer, however, only the Chateau knows?”

I agree with PCB in comment 2. Does anyone know if French vintners were labeling in German prior to WWII? Perhaps sending inferior vintages to the Huns?

Warren Howie Hughes May 27, 2009 · 12:42 pm

RJL, If, indeed, those sly Frenchies sent inferior vintages to those horribly heinous Huns…it would have to qualify as a truly classic case of Sour Grapes, oui?

Read “The Billionaire’s Vinegar” to learn how the wine auction market was ruined for years by one man making fakes literally in his basement. Fascinating read and a must have for any serious collector of aged wines.

who would make a big deal out of a half-empty bottle of spoiled wine with no known source except a suspicious story ?

i especially wouldn’t want a bottle from hitler’s stash if there were reliable proof – it might have been POISIONED !

frankD

All proceeds from the sale of Hitler and/or Nazi items should be taxed by our federal government at 100%, the proceeds going to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

WHH – I dunno, sounds Vichy to me…

We are routinely offered items from Hitler’s various households and lairs. All sorts of things were “liberated” during the latter stages of the war.

We don’t like these things for many reasons we prefer to keep to ourselves, though many do have a certain historic presence which makes them attractive to many.

But my lasting memory is of a trip to London in the mid 70s, and a visit with an English gunsmith who was lovingly engraving a WWII-era Walther pistol with Herman Goring’s name on it in the back room of his shop. I asked him what he intended to do with the gun.

“It’s a tuck up,” he said, smiling at my lifted brow. “I intend to tuck it up the arse of some unsuspecting Yank, they just love this Nazi scrap.”

It is my opinion that fully 90 percent of the “Nazi” items out there are fakes.

Being German myself, it appears to me from the bottom of the label that this bottle was imported by a German import company (“G.m.b.H. & Co. KG” is a specific acronym).

Also, it is very common to have German labels on most French wines sold today. I have no idea whether this would have been done in 1934 but it doesn’t strike me as odd.

-MM

I doubt that a Frenchman would ever put a German label on a bottle of their wine. So let the buyer be ware.

Did anyone think to check with the Chateau and compare it against their records? Seems like a no-brainer. I second the recommendation on the Billionaire’s Vinegar.

Why would anyone be “fascinated” by the thought of an tyrant drinking a bottle of wine in the midst of a war?

Nazi “memorabilia” attracts the lunatic fringe.

What mystery?

‘Stalinist-style structure?”

That is clearly the Tour du Roi, the other major landmark in St.-Emilion. Didn’t you see it on your trip.

It is a formidable rectangular ruin of a tour that, to one eye, might appear ‘Stalinist-style,’ but is clearly far older and certainly available to be seen in that town.

The image on the label is actually two images — the church tower and the Tour du Roi — that are not in scale to each other.

This doesn’t answer the question of the bottle’s provenance, but not one shred of proof has been offered that it is not what it purports to be. It may indeed be a fake. But you’ll need better proof than the questions you’ve presented.

See a 360-degree photo of the St.-Emilion skyline — complete with the Tour du Roi — at this link:

//www.bluephotographie.com/visites_virtuelles/1-visites-virtuelles/19-visite-virtuelle-aerienne-saint-emilion-gironde.html

There is a large rectangular tower near St. Emilion, that somewhat resembles the structure on the label. Maybe the artist just put the area’s two most recognizable landmarks on the label, it a foreshortened/out of scale view.

While it is difficult to examine the bottle’s drawing of St.Emilion at the scale published on the NY Times website, it seems that the large building portrayed at left is not “a Stalinist style structure” but the “Donjon du Roi” which does indeed tower over St. Emilion, and which was built beginning in 1237 under the orders of King Henry III of England and Duke of Aquitaine. See //www.casteland.com/pfr/chateau/aquitaine/gironde/st_emilion/st_emilion_hist2.htm. It would appear that you had other concerns than seeing the sites of St. Emilion when you were there. So we are down to why it says “Frankreich” and does not mention a chateau.
Richard H. Beal

This modern photo from Saint-Emilion’s tourism authority nearly simulates the image on the label:

//www.saint-emilion-tourisme.com/bdd_images/tour-du-roy.jpg

put Errol Morris on the case!

St. Emilion is a town, it is not a chateau. There are many chateaus in St. Emilion. However, an importer could have bought wine (or grapes) from a bottler (or grower) in St. Emilion and sold it as such. It would be like selling a bottle called Napa with grapes or wine that came from that district.

Presumably it would not have been unheard of for a wine to be bottled later, either at the chateau or elsewhere. And it’s easy to imagine that the 1934 vintage was still in barrels at the time of the fall of France, and it was bottled for shipment to Germany.

Plus, who knows, they were probably planning on teaching the French how to speak German.

BTW, it could be the vintage year that’s fake, not the wine, bottle, or provenance.